At
the recent Global Health Exchange: Improving Global Learning conference in
Manchester, Ben Simms, THET’s CEO, gave a stirring keynote speech on the need
to go beyond media headlines and act together to promote both a stronger NHS
and a fortified global health environment.
Joining
speakers and delegates from across the UK and international health sector, from
Public Health England, Royal Colleges and NHS overseas volunteers, the day was
a fantastic moment in the health partnership movement reflecting the vital
energy the Global Health Exchange is bringing to the global health and
development space. This blog reflects on the key points of Ben’s speech.
The Choice
I believe we now face a fundamental choice as a
country. Whether we are to be “a kind and generous” country, as Theresa May
phrased it in her speech to staff at the Department for International
development last week; open to the world, mindful of our mutual dependence. Or
whether we are to be an insular country, holding our sovereignty close to our
chest, suspiciously eyeing our neighbours, both near and far.
Nowhere is this choice more clearly expressed than
in the debate around the UK’s commitment to spend 0.7% of GNI on overseas aid.
The UK is now one of just six wealthier countries
to be meeting this long-standing UN target. In 2015, the UK provided a total of £12.13 billion in overseas aid.
This coming Wednesday, the UK will announce that our contribution increased by
an additional £1 billion in 2016. And next week, the OECD will publish their
global comparison figures, which will show that the UK has seen the largest
increase in overseas aid spending the world over.
It
is a profound and impressive contribution. It is both kind and generous.
The Chicken
This
0.7% investment is of course, underpinned by a searing logic, which speaks of
our national interest. If a chicken sneezed thirty years ago, so
the joke goes, it would have been bad news for the chicken and its relatives,
but nobody else would have taken much notice. Today, our increased
understanding that human, animal and ecosystem health are inextricably linked
combined with our ease of travel, means that such a sneeze will be heard in
every capital of the world.
Ebola
is often cited as the wake-up call which taught us that the health of one
country is dependent on the health of another. Arguably, it’s not the first
wake-up call. HIV and AIDS was such a call, as the 33 million people who died
from AIDS-related illnesses can testify. Hopefully, Ebola will be the last such
call:
The
world is awake. It is time to put together a new landscape that will deliver
universal health coverage to all its citizens. And UK overseas aid has a crucial role to play in this. It is in our
national interest.
The Media
However
logical this sounds, it cannot be taken for granted. The 0.7% commitment is
under unprecedented attack. Just in January, the Mail on Sunday persisted in
its campaign for overseas aid to be re-directed to support the NHS. And it’s
not just the Mail. It’s The Times and the Express. In fact, it’s many of the
papers that campaigned vigorously for Brexit.
For
THET, the choice the Daily Mail gives is one that speaks very poignantly to our
vision of a world where everyone has access to healthcare. The decision between
investing in ODA or the NHS, is not an either or, they can and should go hand
in hand.
The Future
We
need to fight for an internationally-focused NHS. At the heart of this is the challenge of ensuring that, as we learn to
identify the benefits we can derive from an internationally-minded NHS, to too
we must think carefully about how these align with the benefit derived from
host countries.
All this means asking and answering difficult questions: not just around
how we balance the interests of the NHS with those of overseas health services.
But how, for example, we transition from aid dependency to grasping the
opportunities for commercial activity overseas which could produce valuable
income for the NHS.
To travel on this journey involves making a choice. The choice I talked
about at the beginning: about what country we want to be a part of.
Theresa May’s speech last week set the standard by
which we can now judge our government’s promises, exemplified by our commitment to spend 0.7% of our
national income on overseas aid.
We too need to express this
choice, individually and organisationally, to grapple with this complexity to
produce an outward facing NHS, one that brings benefit both to countries
overseas and to its own patients. In Our Mutual Interest.
Ben Simms
CEO,
THET